for optimal functionality of this website please use updated versions of internet browsers (Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Internet Explorer, Opera etc.)
The Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP)
Thematic Group – Public Spaces and Urban Cultures
June 11-14, 2014
Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest, Romania
Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism will host a four-day annual meeting of the AESOP thematic group of Public Spaces and Urban Cultures in Bucharest, Romania. The meeting is a second one under ‘Becoming Local’ theme, following an inspiring first meeting in Istanbul in November 2013. The aim of the ‘Becoming Local’ series is to share international, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary perspectives in studies of public spaces and urban cultures.
The objective of Bucharest meeting is to debate locally present issues within a broader context of the post-socialistic communities across Europe and wider. The field-visits, presentations and discussions of high quality work of scholars and practitioners working on the theme aim to offer an insight into the topic as well as provide valuable sources of inspiration for further improvements of both theoretical and practical
approaches in the field.
Gabriel Pascariu at email@example.com (on behalf of local organising team)
Matej Nikšič at firstname.lastname@example.org (on behalf of AESOP TG)
Call for Papers
(Deadline for abstracts: Monday, April 14th 2014)
The atomising society and public space – the case of post-socialist territories
Eastern European countries have been in a state of a permanent socio-economic change in the last century. The last major change took place at a turn of a millennium and caused significant alterations of all social strata with human relationships redefined and individual and collective behaviours changed considerably. Consequently the communal spirit was replaced with the individualism and visible social segregation. The rise of commercialisation and privatisation more generally have been shaping a new type of consumerist society seemingly characterised by a weak social cohesion, weakened empathy and decreased solidarity.
The social changes are reflected more or less directly in a transformation and evolution of urban public space. Newly designed public spaces, created under the constrained financial budgets, profit-oriented economic rationale, and with the know-how bounded with post-fordist economies, often missed to address the cohesive dimensions. Some newly designed public spaces may appear to be inviting and attractive at a first glance, but a more thorough look often reveals their social flatness characterised by lack of spontaneous encounters and usages of space, exclusiveness to some user groups, exclusion of some disadvantaged users etc. This may partly be a result of a widely spread top-down planning approach which fails to understand and address communal as well as individual user’s values, behaviours and needs in the broadest sense, as well as a result of the ongoing commercialisation processes that have other than social well-being objectives.
Similarly as elsewhere across the continent there were however nuances of public life in Eastern European cities through time. Viewed from today’s perspective some of them are prized and some criticized for their (un)ability of supporting social life and building the commune. Many cities for example have had some good inter-world-war traditions of sense of public space, un-paralleled to any examples in the periods that followed. On the other hand a number of cities got public spaces that were not conceived for social contacts and improved sense of community in the post-WWII period as they were rather designed to host public events related to representation of political powers. Above all any generalisations are uneven as a considerable variety of the approaches to the provision of public space across territories and times can be traced.
This complex situation opens challenging questions at both theoretical and practical levels:
- What is the role of public space in the environments with a lost sense of a community? Are there any specifics related to post-socialistic societies in this sense?
- In what way can a sociality of place be strengthened through public space provision?
- How local life was created in the frameworks of the communist regimes (totalitarian social design?) and in space of Western Fordist welfare states (total social design?) on the one hand, and how local life is created nowadays under the influence of global flows on the other? To what extent are the historical traditions and trajectories helpful in finding contemporary ways of reviving communal being given the contemporary socio-economic realities?
- Who is in charge of rethinking and improving urban public spaces in service of local communities? What are the roles of civil society groups, actors and collectives in these processes? What are the roles of each individual her-/himself?
- (How) Can grand planning schemes create liveable public spaces today?
- How can civil society and how can local authorities deal with the increasing private interests in the field of public space (resulting in its privatisation, commoditisation and commercialisation) in order to protest and foster non-profit interests?
- How can market driven planning approaches be overcome in order to provide inclusive public spaces and fair redistribution of (public and collective) resources?
The Bucharest “Becoming Local” meeting aims to reflect different points of view from the widest professional and general publics. Having in mind that public space lies at an intersection of a number of disciplines and is a crossroads between theory and practices, a discussion beyond disciplinary or academic constraints is anticipated and contributors from any professional background as well as non-academic groups (NGOs, state actors, and so forth) are invited to add to the discussion.
Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism (www.iaim.ro)
with the support of:
- The Faculty of Urban Planning / UAUIM (http://www.uauim.ro/facultati/urbanism/)
- The Professional Association of Romanian Planners (www.conferinta-apur.ro)
More details here: http://becominglocalbucharest.ro/venues-access/
Wednesday – June 11th 2014 – Arrivals & Introductory session
Thursday – June 12th 2014 – Field trip and discussions
Friday – June 13th 2014 – Workshops and panel discussion
Saturday – June 14th 2014 – Sum up & Departures
For full unrolling of the event please consult the section Programme
We invite you to consult the proceedings of the Becoming Local Conference.
The papers were selected after a selection process based on the submission of an abstract of no more than 300 words and a short biography of 100 words.
Organisational and Advisory Board
Celia Ghyka, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest
Liviu Ianăşi, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest
Sabine Knierbein, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna
Matej Niksic, Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana
Gabriel Pascariu, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest
Ceren Sezer, Delft University of Technology, Urban4, Delft
Tihomir Viderman, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna
Local Organizing team:
Mihai Alexandru, Faculty or Urban Planning – UAUIM
Tudor Elian, Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism, Bucharest
Cătălina Ioniță, Faculty or Urban Planning – UAUIM
Paul Mureșan-Iuga, Faculty or Urban Planning – UAUIM
Reinhold Stadler, Faculty or Urban Planning – UAUIM
Participation to the meeting is free of charge.
- TG Bucharest meeting (operational from April 2014 on): www.becominglocalbucharest.ro
- Ion Mincu University of Architecture and Urbanism: www.uauim.ro/en/
- Aesop: www.aesop-planning.eu/
- Aesop Thematic Group Public Spaces and Urban Cultures: www.aesop-planning.eu/blogs/en_GB/urban-cultures-and-public-spaces and publicspaces-urbancultures.wikispaces.com/How+to+join+us